Back at it early this morning after a great party last night, where our own Katy Wheeler rocked the house in her “Hybrid Environment Hydra” monster costume. There were also Vegas showgirls, awesome celeb impersonators, and a whole lot of karaoke singing! Who says that RM people don’t know how to have fun? A good time was indeed had by all.
Catching up with the team and we notice some themes emerging from seminars and discussions with other vendors and participants. One of those is definitely the “big bucket” approach to records management, especially when it comes to dealing with email and electronic records. Below are some quick notes from two presentations that looked at this approach.
Records Retention Requirements for Electronic Records
Donald Skupsky, JD, CRM, FAI
Donald Skupsky is as close to a record management icon as you are likely to find, and the packed seminar room (over 550 people) came as no surprise.
He framed his discussion around a central problem: electronic records are clogging our IT infrastructures. Where once they were seen as a solution, electronic records are fast becoming a problem for many organizations.
You’ve got to control your electronic records by classifying them and linking them to your retention schedule, something that many people are having trouble with. They simply don’t have the knowledge and are confused by what to do with both structured and unstructured data, as well as the attendant metadata.
The solution, in part, is using a “big bucket” records classification strategy approach (see below), which allows for easier classification and linking to the retention schedule, thereby beginning to eliminate the clogging effect of electronic records.
Using this as a base, he then outlined the following items as critical for a successful retention strategy for electronic records:
- implementation
- EDMS
- rules-based records retention schedule
- complete support of upper management, especially legal
- full employee cooperation
- audits and other controls
Big Buckets for Enterprise Records Management
Susan Cisco, Ph.D., CRM, FAI; Sue Trombley
So what exactly is the big bucket approach? Basically, it is founded on the idea that more choices means more complexity, and by streamlining taxonomy and retention options for RM users you make it easier for them to make the right choice.
In this approach, records series or “buckets” have the same or similar:
- business processes
- legal and regulatory requirements
- business requirements
- retention periods
What is a reasonable number of buckets? The average company should come in around 50 to 70, with 100 as a maximum.
This means that there is less effort needed than in more granular retention schedules in inventorying and scheduling routine records. Not surprisingly, big buckets are getting traction in meeting the challenge of the daily classification of large volumes of e-records.
And because it is easier for users to manually classify content for retention, it mitigates the risk of retaining records for too long, lowering your total cost of operation and making it easier for your software to categorize your e-records.
Of course, there are questions around how the approach can handle case-type files and event-driven retention, but in the ongoing effort to bring compliance to the desktop, the big bucket approach may be the next big thing.